Is the right the source of antisemitism in America.

Hillary Clinton famously called Trump supporters “a basket of deplorables” and went on to explain that half of them were “unredeemable”, Nazis and Klansmen, while the other half “needed reeducation.” Her statement was applauded on the left, and taken as an insult on the right. To this day, Biden and his group make the claim that Republicans are antisemites and a threat to American democracy. The proof here is a 2017 video of Klansmen carrying torches, saying “Jews will not replace us,” as they protested the removal of a statue of Robert E. Lee in Virginia. A further claim is that the rise in antisemitic incidents, shootings, beatings, etc., are the result of Trump and the Republicans. Things are not quite so black and white, or course, e.g. during the ANTIFA protests/riots four synagogs were attacked in LA alone, and the Crown-Heights neighborhood of Brooklyn was torched. Many of the attackers of Jews have Islamic names and left association, things that don’t suggest Republicans but Democrats.

CNN has claimed that the difference is intent: Trump’s intent is evil, while ANTIFA’s is to elevate black and Moslem lives by allowing them to vent their righteous anger (on Jews). The Moslems who attacked Jews in Monsey, India, Paris and elsewhere are acting for justice, while the marchers in Charlottesville march for hate. In a special program on “Antisemitism in American”, CNN made the claim that no Jew should support the Republicans or Jewish Israel, an apartheid, colonial occupation in their view. This appears to be the view of the Biden White House too. They have yet to congratulate the winner of Israeli presidential elections, 5 days after the election. They contacted Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian leader instead, to discuss joint efforts to enhance Palestinian security. Obama did the same, seven years ago, not congratulating the Israeli election winner (Netanyahu), and snubbed the Israeli delegation on their visit, leaving them to sit alone without food or photographs.

According to the CNN expert on Antisemitism, the lefts’ dismissal of Israel’s leaders is because European Jews are not Jews at all, but Russians with no connection to the land. To my thinking claims like this against a group’s identity are horribly hurtful — CNN’s expert was claiming, essentially, that the jews were lying about everything since the beginning. If Jews are not from Israel, why have we prayed in that direction for return, and in the language of that land. If we did not build the old synagogs, when did we displace the builders and take over their language and culture? Attacks on Jewish identity are more serious, in my mind, than any march for Robert E. Lee. (I’ve written in favor of the peace hammered out between Grant and Lee).

Perhaps even more damaging is the left’s attack on Jewish education. The New York Times ran three-page article claiming that Jewish education abuses the students by not teaching real science or history, and by enforcing religious and sexual norms that are counter to the children’s rights — rights that include LGBQT+ expression. While it is true that Jewish education is not a fan of LGBQT+, but neither is Moslem education, or Catholic, or Mormon. Education is how a culture survives. Some Catholic leaders have noted that they have a stake in this.

The left is anti Israel and anti Jewish education, yet claims to be the defenders of Jews because they can’t stand Trump.

Speaking of survival, about half of all Jews now live in Israel, a state established by the UN in 1947 in part as a response to the mass murder of Jews in Europe. Along with Europeans, about half of the Israelis today are exiles from communities wiped out by Moslem governments: from Egypt, Tunisia, Iran, Iraq, Turkey, and Yemen. If Israel becomes Islamic as Obama favored, they are likely to exile all the Jews as they did in 1968 in Jerusalem, and as the surrounding countries have done. Where would the Jews go? It’s not a problem for Obama-Biden, but it’s a survival problem for Israelis. My sense is that the left is, by far, the more antisemitic, both in terms of culture and physical safety.

Robert Buxbaum, November 7, 2022

3 thoughts on “Is the right the source of antisemitism in America.

  1. Peter Shenkin

    Hi,

    I don’t agree with the views you attribute to Obama, etc. and I don’t view Israel as “an apartheid state”. I don’t believe Kerry is correct if he said Israel can be either Jewish or democratic but not both*. I don’t view the right as the source of antisemitism in America. Antisemitism has always been lurking in American life, sometimes in the background, sometimes more up-front.

    But I asked you for some direct reference that would validate your assertion that Obama favored “Israel becoming Islamic” and would still appreciate that. Until I see it I am skeptical.

    -P.

    * To be honest, I feel it is fine for Israel to limit immigration to Jews, just as I have no problem with Saudi Arabia to excluding Jews and Christians from citizenship. That is their right a a sovereign nation. I don’t think borders need to be open; every nation has a right to enforce its immigration policy, though there will be disagreement, in a democracy, about what that policy should be.

    Reply
    1. R.E. Buxbaum Post author

      Obama opposed Israel as a Jewish state, and did his best to snub its president, with Kerry claiming that Israel could be Jewish or democratic — but that it could not be both. You may agree with Obama/ Kerry here. I do not. Obama attacked Israel for having a wall, one they believed necessary to keep out Islamic immigration and Islamic attacks. Most Israelis favor their president, favor their wall, favor avoiding the terror attacks, and favor avoiding Israel becoming Islamic as it would with open immigration. Kerry countered that Israel, with its wall, was becoming an “apartheid state.” I consider this more than anti-zionist. As a final slap, in his last days in office, Obama got the UN to vote that Israeli settlements have “no legal validity and constitutes a flagrant violation under international law”.

      Reply

Leave a Reply